D46: Proposals, Costs and Projections
With one negotiation session and two days between now and a potential strike, can the D46 School Board and the teachers' union find common ground?
The Grayslake CCSD 46 Board of Education and the teachers' union will make one final attempt Tuesday afternoon at negotiating a new contract in hopes of avoiding a strike on Wednesday.
The two sides failed to reach an agreement Friday, after a six hour session with a federal mediator.
The Current Proposals
Board of Education:
- Two-year contract
- Retirement
- 5.75% salary increase for four years if retirement notice submitted by March 1, 2013
- 3% for three years if notice submitted after March 1, 2013
- Compensation
- First year: No increase in salaries or stipends. No step or lane changes
- Second year: $1,000 off-schedule stipend for all certified staff who have not submitted for retirement
- Maintain at Current Levels
- Professional Growth at $110,000
- Flex payment ($6,292) for 1/3 of teachers
- 6% raises for retirees who already submitted retirement notice
Teachers' Union
- Two-year contract
- Retirement
- 6% salary increase for four years if retirement notice submitted by March 1, 2013
- 5.75% for four years three years if notice submitted after March 1, 2013
- Compensation
- First year: No increase in salaries or stipends. Lane changes allowed in Feb. 2013
- Second year: Two step movements: Sept. 2013 and March 2014. Current contract lane changes provisions
- Maintain at Current Levels
- Professional Growth at $110,00
- Flex payment ($6,292) for 1/3 of teachers
- 6% raises for retirees who already submitted retirement notice
While the union said Friday that it did share one suggestion of having a one year contract with only about a 1.75% salary increase for this year, Lake County Federation of Teachers Local 504 Business Agent Jim Pergander said, "The school board would only accept a one year deal with a hard freeze and no increase of any kind."
Board President Ray Millington said Friday, "The school board has attempted to discuss different scenarios with the union. Unfortunately the union hasn't accepted or countered any of our attempts to resolve the issues."
Costs and Projections
According to a presentation at the town hall meeting Jan. 9, the cost of the school board's proposal would be an additional $300,000 in FY13-14.
The union's proposal would cost an additional $200,000 in FY12-13, and $950,000 in FY13-14. The union proposal would be equivalent to 23 teaching positions in FY13-14.
Fund balance on 6/30/12: $8,126,837
Projected balance on 6/30/13: $7,904,301
Average monthly expenditures: $3,000,000
Projected low point:(May 2013) $1,900,000
Brad Faxton
8:29 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
You guys are so golly gee close - one needs to give a little and the other needs to take a little. Meet in the middle.
kathleen
10:18 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Since both sides are so close, I will be very disappointed if no one makes one final compromise in order to keep our children in school!
Lennie Jarratt
10:41 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
http://grayslake.patch.com/events/grayslake-d46-teacher-strike-townhall
Angela Sykora
11:29 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Just in from the D46 e-Newsletter alert system:
An initial School Reach phone call by will go out Tuesday night if an agreement cannot be reached and school is cancelled. Additional information will be available at that time.
There will be no updates sent through our e-News email system, the District Facebook account, or Twitter account. Please bookmark and watch the website for updates and additional information.
GL Resident
11:59 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
I do not see how the difference is "close". There is a difference of almost $800,000 on the table here. Take that number and divide by the # of property tax-paying households to see how much taxes will be bumped to pay for that "difference". Let em walk. Guaranteed raises are never a good thing, they breed incompetence and apathy.
Brad Faxton
12:18 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Yer cold consciences is an awesome thing.
DS
12:22 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
What is this Union doing for anyone besides creating animosity? I say go on strike and may all the teachers cross the line and break up the union...We all need jobs and raises..look around...How many businesses are suffering? Seriously get a clue!...
Terri
2:49 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
It was actually the BOE that started this whole polarization thing. To their credit, they quickly pulled back, but not with an apology. Those scars are deep.
RonVerdi
4:21 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Good luck with your wish that the teachers cross the lien and break up the union. So the BOE could walk all over them again in the future? The BOE has created the animosity, NOT the union!
Grayslake Parent of 2
12:25 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
The only reason the negotiations are as close as they are is because the teachers have continued to compromise. Sooner or later the BOE has to be held accountable for their incompetence in managing this situation. The financial situation has only declined since this board has been in place. Having BOE members who are currently receiving a Teacher's Pension and another who is part of the Woodland School District Union as a bus driver only magnifies the fact that they turned a blind eye to the upcoming negotiations prior to the contract expiring. This BOE was fully aware that these negotiations would require diligent financial planning. They ignored this and instead banked on the Union continuing to give ground to avoid a work stoppage. Now the community is facing the consequences because the BOE was too passive.
PB&J
12:57 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Well said Grayslake Parent!
Pete Gardner
3:45 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Grayslake parent you have left out several valuable factors, the real estate market, the economy, and state aid. Those factors do far more damage to the budget than any others. I'm just an old man who lives on a meager retirement but I do know how budgets work. Fiscal incompetence by the BOE is not at the top of the list for causes of financial decline to the district. You have singled out two people and held them more responsible than the main causes. I may be old but I'm not too slow to deduce your personal dislike of the people taints your view. It's sad to see finger pointing rather than the actual causes. Nobody is perfect but from what I've seen it takes a majority for decisions. May I be so bold to suggest you write letters to your local reps, state reps, senators, congress, and encourage them to help fund the schools the way the state is mandated to. That may help rather than come here and shake your finger.
Lennie Jarratt
3:53 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Grayslake Parent, you may be interesting in learning more facts at the Townhall meeting on Wed night. You are leaving out many details and appear to be coming from a biased view point instead of a factual one.
Terri
4:05 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
...and now a word from our sponsor...
HM
1:40 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Grayslake parent - this board, while completely dysfunctional, is not wholly responsible for the state of the finances. Brad Goldstein warned us about this very situation (deficit spending) years ago, when the state funding was starting to dry up. Prior to that, under the leadership of Dr. Anderson (former superintendent prior to Ellen Correll), the district had to cut art/music/PE due to financial woes. We have not been in a strong financial position since the late 1990s. This is not new.
Please outline what compromises the teachers have made to date. I would be quite interested in knowing. They agreed to a lesser raise a little over a year ago, and the board and Ellen made them more than whole by giving everyone a $1000 bonus from stimulus funds. If you feel they have "compromised" by paying more in healthcare, I find that to be irrelevant - everyone pays more for healthcare.
Look at what the bump in pay during thier last 4 years does not only to district payroll, but to the pension burden of the public. I find it repulsive that they feel entitled to significangly boost their pay their last four years so they will make considerably more in retirement, when they contribute nothing to the schools. It is not sustainable to pay a teacher a pension when they are 55 years old, and will live an average of 20 more years. They contribute about 4 years worth of funds - the rest comes from taxpayers. As I said already - not sustainable.
4GirlsNoBoys
2:45 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
There are many things I could write, but I’m going with the net-net . . . Stand firm, BOE members! Let them strike.
Many parents are saying the same thing, but they are intimidated to post due to concern over retribution.
I truly appreciate and value teachers for all they do, but I do not support them in their quest this time. When things improve and we can be fiscally responsible, then I’ll support you for raises. Meanwhile, struggle through like the rest of us are doing.
Benjamin Dover
3:51 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Annual Pay Raises for the Past 13 years:
D46 Teachers - Everybody Else
99-00 9.98% - Average US Worker raise in '99 - 5.3%
00-01 6.54% - Average US Worker raise in '00 - 5.2%
01-02 5.78% - Average US Worker raise in '01 - 2.3%
02-03 5.84% - Average US Worker raise in '02 - 1.0%
03-04 5.39% - Average US Worker raise in '03 - 2.4%
04-05 6.37% - Average US Worker raise in '04 - 4.4%
05-06 5.20% - Average US Worker raise in '05 - 3.5%
06-07 5.21% - Average US Worker raise in '06 - 4.4%
07-08 5.20% - Average US Worker raise in '07 - 4.3%
08-09 3.96% - Average US Worker raise in '08 - 2.2%
09-10 3.96% - Average US Worker raise in '09 - (-1.5%)
10-11 2.75% - Average US Worker raise in '10 - 2.3%
11-12 3.96% - Average US Worker raise in '11 - 3.0%
(source for Average US Worker raise - National Average Wage Index)
To put that in perspective...A D46 teacher who started in 1999 at $35,000 would now be earning $69,189, not including step or lane changes.
The same average US Worker starting at the same time at $35,000 would now be earning $51,196, not including any promotions.
Seems teachers have been on a pretty good ride...pay raises that outpace the average American for at least the past 13 years and a pay raise every year for 30 consecutive years.
While they do a good job (and in some cases an outstanding job) it is very hard to be supportive of them going on strike over money...money the taxpayers just don't have.
Terri
4:06 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Got those stats for lake county or Grayslake?
WorriedParent
7:41 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
As you have said many times, you can't compare teachers to the private sector they are only paid to work 190 days. You just seem to think (even though I don't see the statistics) that because Grayslake residents make more than the Grayslake teachers we should therefore be willing to pay them whatever they want.
Terri
7:55 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
What I've said many times, and thanks for the opportunity to say it yet again, is stop trying to annualize a teacher salary in order to compare it to the private sector. Unless, of course, you can tell me how many days each Grayslake resident works that is included in the average.
WorriedParent
8:28 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Yes, you are a broken record. It is convenient to not try to annualized their salary to that of the private sector because of the differences in "days worked" but you sure can compare apples to apples when it comes to salary and raises and who makes more than whom and who should be expected to pay what.
I mean you can take an educated guess for an example....FT = 20 days a month x 12 months take about 10 days off for the average 2 weeks vacation time. Compared to days worked a residents who makes 50,000 and works 230 days a year makes about 217/day. A teacher making 50,000 and works 190 days a year makes about 263/day. But what the heck, average residents get paid for their vacation time off so we are paid for 240 days anyway.
You may not like the statistics Benjamin posted above but I can tell you that most of the Grayslake residents have not had raises like the ones the teachers have had over the last couple of years. Heck our police officers are not getting raises like that either! If you have, kudos to you.
Terri
8:38 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
There you go again...how many days does the individual Grayslake wage earner work? Be specific and provide statistical data.
Bens data compared a very specific small segment of the population to a national average...even when more regional data was available. That make sense to you?
C-Dub
8:18 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Terri,
I will use myself as an example, I am getting tired of you flapping your soup coolers about specific data. I make $59,500 a year. I work a total of 231 (not counting the random Saturday or Sunday for a few hours at home) days. 52 * 5 - 29 (vacation and company holidays). So I make roughly $257 a day at what I do. I have not seen an increase in my base salary since 2009. I have had 2 merit bonus, one in 2010 and again in 2011. the total of those was $3,500 (1750 * 2). I feel that as an individual earner (my wife also works, but we are working with individuals here), that I may be at the average, just my humble opinoin. Those figures are ALL PRE-TAX, so the actual take home is MUCH LESS, especially now (thanks fiscal cliff). I would love to walk into my bosses office and say, Hey what about a little help here, but I know the outcome of that before I even leave my chair at my desk.
There is no argument about the how great our teachers are, I know some go above and beyond the call of duty, do they deserve a raise, yes, I am not arguing that point either. What quirks my chain is that there is no money in the coffers to pay for it.
Jose Cuervo
4:40 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
@ Terri & Swanson, you continually preach that the teachers are united. This afternoon my son has several friends over. Two of their teachers told every class that they did not care about the money and did not want to strike. You think those are the only two in the district who feel that way? These two said it to classrooms filled with students who are old enough to relay that to their parents.
Now I imagine that those teachers didn't say that to the kids just to make them feel better! For those two who were vocal there are a lot more who are quietly saying the same thing.
RonVerdi
4:44 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
I was just at a school speaking with several teachers who told me quite the opposite and are willing to strike if needed. I was also there with 7-8 other parents who stand firmly with the teachers as well.
Jose Cuervo
4:58 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
@ Swanson, of course there are teachers and parents on both sides. My point, which I've continually made but you like to shoot down is that things are not as united as they seem. For every few that tell me they are against the strike, there will be a few who will say they are for the strike to you. It's foolish for anyone to think support is solely on one side. The support from the teachers to strike isn't as strong as you and Terri claim. As far as crossing the line, it won't happen. I agree with you. But it isn't because there is blind devotion to the strike it is because there is real fear of retribution from the union and coworkers. That doesn't equate to "being solid"!
RonVerdi
5:06 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
@Jose ...and the support for the BOE isn't as strong as you think. Do you know how many teachers live within the district, have talked to the members in the community and received their support? I doubt you know but I can tell you that there are many.
Jose Cuervo
5:11 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Swanson11, I'll repeat: "My point, which I've continually made but you like to shoot down is that things are not as united as they seem. For every few that tell me they are against the strike, there will be a few who will say they are for the strike to you. It's foolish for anyone to think support is solely on one side".
Moving on....
Terri
5:41 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
The vote was like 320 to 3.
You should listen to those kids. The teachers don't want to strike...none of them...and it's not about the money. But they will. And it's not out of fear. There is solidarity.
4GirlsNoBoys
10:07 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
At the risk of hurting your (teacher) feelings, I want to point out something logical as well as something factual. Have you thought that some parents are politely supporting you teachers to your face because not only is it awkward, but they don’t want to be labeled or have your feelings change for their children. (-Logical) Please also think about your parent volunteers. Have you noticed how there are fewer parent volunteers at school? (-Fact) That’s because those volunteers really don’t support you for your desire for raises now, and they don’t want to try to pull-off acting like they do think you should have raises. They support you for what you do, but not for getting raises now.
Yes, there are some who do support the teachers. If you really want to find out who supports you, hold a Town Hall meeting like the residents have requested of you.
4GirlsNoBoys
10:24 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
I apologize for the placement of my previous post. This wasn't the best place to put it.
Lennie Jarratt
4:10 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Reminder - 7pm at State Bank of the Lakes, 50 Commerce Dr, Grayslake.
Townhall meeting to discuss the strike. Hosted by For Our Children's Future.
Katie Osmon
1:15 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013
Since when did our children's education become not so important? They are our future. They will be running this country. It made me sad to take my son to his school (Prairie View) yesterday so he could get his gymshoes from his classroom. The halls were dark, the classrooms were empty and sad. Even my son noticed. The secretary was almost in tears about this. She told me that the teachers were in tears over this. Try having your child go to a school where all the teachers really do care about is that paycheck. I've been there and so has my son.
Forethe Community
1:36 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
350 people showed up Sunday in the freezing cold to support the teachers of their district. That’s:
• 10 times the number that showed up for either of the For Our Children’s Future town halls.
• 10 times the number, on average, that shows up to BOE meetings.
• 5 times the number that have ever shown up for a BOE meeting (in recent history).
30 local business showed their support for the teachers by supplying food, providing parking, providing warming shelters, allowing access to their bathrooms, and donating cash to help teachers that might need it in a prolonged strike. Residual benefits went to local food banks through excess donations. That’s:
• 10 times the number of local business’s that spoke at any levy hearing.
• Equal to the number of attendants at any For Our Children’s Future town Hall.
• Equal to or greater than the average attendance at a BOE meeting.
Actions speak louder than words. I applaud the board for listening to the public. I only wish the silent majority had been more vocal at the levy hearings. It’s too late to do what the public really wanted.