Update, Tues. Jan. 15, 11:55 p.m.
From the D46 Facebook page:
Per Superintendent Correll at 11:52PM:
Unfortunately, the Board of Education and D46 teachers were unable to reach an agreement. The teachers have informed the district that they will be on strike beginning tomorrow, Wednesday, January 16th. Please watch the website for further updates.
Patch will be posting a separate post as more information becomes available.
From the D46 Facebook:
We would like to welcome all the new people who joined us today/tonight. We wish it was under better circumstances, but welcome none the less.
Just an update: the Board of Education and Teachers' Union are still negotiating in hopes of averting a strike tomorrow. As soon as we are notified, a School Reach call will go out, the web will be updated as well as an email blast, Facebook update and Twitter update.
We expect to know something at any time - and certainly by 5:00am tomorrow morning.
Updated Tuesday, Jan. 15, 11:05 a.m.
Superintendent Ellen Correll has posted the following statement on the D46 Website:
Dear Parent/Guardians:
As you are aware, the Board of Education and the Teachers' Union have been in negotiations for several months. As of this date, no agreement has been reached. The Teachers' Union has identified January 16, 2013 as a tentative strike date if no agreement can be reached during negotiations this evening.
I realize that this is a challenge, for you, the parents. I will be sending a School Reach call out either late Tuesday night or early Wednesday morning regarding the results of the meeting on Tuesday. I will notify you as soon as I know whether or not there will be a strike.
Please review our website (www.d46.org) for updates and other information regarding the impending strike. Hopefully, both sides will be able to come to an agreement on Tuesday night.
Sincerely,
Ellen Correll
Original post
Parents of students in District 46 are expected to learn tonight whether classes will resume normally Wednesday or if they need to make daycare arrangements as the result of a teacher strike.
The school board and teachers' union will meet at 3:45 p.m. this afternoon for one last bargaining session.
The two sides failed to reach an agreement Friday, after a six hour session with a federal mediator.
The main sticking point is compensation.
The district has agreed to a two-year teacher contract, but is holding firm on instituting a salary freeze with no step or lane changes. However, the board has offered to give all certified staff who have not submitted a notice to retire a $1,000 stipend in year two, which would cost the district about $300,000.
Initially, the union proposed a 3 percent salary increase for both contract years.
At the Nov. 28 negotiating session, teachers said they would agree to continue working at their current 2011-12 salary schedule for next school year, but they wanted lane change compensation paid in February 2013, which would cost $200,000, and two salary steps scheduled for Sept. 2013 and March 2014, which would cost $750,000, according to the district.
Friday's session included the union's suggestion of having a one year contract with a salary increase of about 1.75 percent for 2012-13, which the district has not agreed to.
"The school board has attempted to discuss different scenarios with the union. Unfortunately the union hasn't accepted or countered any of our attempts to resolve the issues," stated school board president Ray Millington on the district's Website.
According to a presentation at the town hall meeting Jan. 9, the cost of the school board's proposal would be an additional $300,000 in FY13-14.
The union's proposal would cost an additional $200,000 in FY12-13, and $950,000 in FY13-14. The union proposal would be equivalent to 23 teaching positions in FY13-14.
Prepared to strike
If a contract agreement cannot be reached today, teachers are prepared to strike Wednesday.
The following information was posted to the district's Website Monday morning:
An initial School Reach phone call by will go out Tuesday night if an agreement cannot be reached and school is cancelled. Additional information will be available at that time.
There will be no updates sent through our e-News email system, the District Facebook account, or Twitter account. Please bookmark and watch the website for updates and additional information.
Superintendent Ellen Correll said she has been working with Champions to develop childcare plans at Meadowview and Prairieview schools in the case of a strike. The Grayslake Park District will also offer two strike camps.
In addition, the district has been accepting applications for temporary substitute teachers to provide services to students if feasible.
Strike or no strike, "For Our Children's Future," a citizen initiative established by local activist, one-time State Senate candidate and Lake County Tea Party leader Lennie Jarratt, will host a town hall meeting at 7 p.m. Wednesday at State Bank of the Lakes to discuss teacher contract issues. Jarratt said all D46 school members are invited to participate.
Strike timeline
- Oct. 12, 2012: The school board declares an impasse. The union prepares to vote to authorize a strike.
- Oct. 16: Teachers' union approves an authorization to strike if necessary.
- Oct. 25: The board and teachers' union post their best and final offers of the contract.
- Oct. 30: The Board of Education and the teachers' union meet for the first time with a federal mediator.
- Nov. 12: A second bargaining session results in little progress.
- Nov. 13: A strike date of Jan. 16 is announced.
- Nov. 28: Some progress is made during a negotiation session between the two sides, however a contract agreement is still not reached.
- Dec. 11: The first 'Town Meeting' is held by the D46 Board to address concerns from the public.
- Dec. 20: The district announces it is accepting applications for substitute teachers in preparation for a potential strike by the union.
- Jan. 9, 2013: A second 'Town Meeting' is hosted by the D46 Board.
- Jan. 11: Another negotiation session is held.
- Jan. 12: Both sides agree to negotiate once more on Jan. 15.
- Jan. 16: The teachers' union will strike if a contract agreement is not reached.
Check back with Patch for the latest strike updates.
Dr. Charlotte Nielsen
9:55 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Just curious, how have the administrators' salaries grown in the last 2 years?
Angela Sykora
10:05 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
You can find FY11/12 salary info here: http://ww2.d46.org/financials1112.asp
FY12/13 is here: http://ww2.d46.org/financials1213.asp
Ralf Landmesser
10:13 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
I've asked the same question and was shot down for not staying on topic. I thought the topic was the district's budget. However, others seem to think non-union people can make money, but nasty union members have to take what they're given.
Terri
2:19 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
...just sayin...
Terri
10:16 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
There are significant errors in this report
http://ww2.d46.org/district/distpdf/pa97-0609-1213-011113.pdf
Ralf Landmesser
10:40 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
So let me get this straight, people are pounding teachers for "only working 9 months", but I look at the administrators' report and I see them with more than 3 weeks of sick time, and some have as many as 5 weeks of vacation, and they get all the holidays as well. But again, we can't bring them up because this is a teachers' issue.
HM
11:13 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
FYI...There is a PE teacher on there making over $90,000. No offense to this person, but really? I find this an abomination. We pay that much for someone to tell our kids to run, and play volleyball. There are excellent science, math and english teachers earning far below that number, yet they are the ones who should be making those kinds of salaries. This is Union work at it's worst - everyone gets the same increases, reagardless of the job. Disgusting.
HM
11:25 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Ralf - most on that list are teachers. They all get the 16 days sick time. The difference is vacation days - those are only to the administrators, because they work year-round, not just during the school calendar. If there is vacation time, it is an administrator, if no vacation time, it is a teacher.
Doug Daluga
9:31 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
HM - Perhaps that PE teacher is also coaching, for which they would receive added compensation.
HM
9:57 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
A fair assumption, Doug, but no, this teacher is not a coach in D46.
Dr
11:02 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
@Terri, please educate us as to the "significant errors". Simply stating that there are "significant errors" is exactly the type of sensationalism that has created this mess. Facts please. If everyone would just concentrate on the facts instead of trying to manipulate them....and most arguements I have seen on this site have been manipulation of facts and numbers on both sides. Reality is: Teachers want to be paid more. Reality is: money is tight. Reality is: Teaching contracts have several benifits that are hard for private sector working folks to understand (automatic raises, lane changes, etc) because they are largely not present in the private sector. Trying to compare teachers with doctors or lawyers....or annualizing pay just isn't sound. Teaching is important...but so are a lot of jobs...police...carpenter...mechanic...dentist...lawyer. They all do NOT make the same amount of money and I have never heard my mechanic ask to make what my dentist makes. If Grayslake was a town of millionaires (I wish) should teachers make a million just because they teach there? I think not. I believe in a fair wage...lets just concentrate on the facts, please.
RonVerdi
3:27 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Are you saying a carpenter, mechanic, or lawyer has a more important job than a teacher? No profession affects the future of our nation more than a teacher does. That comment is an insult to teachers and you need to have your head examined.
Terri
3:30 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Anyone making an honest living and paying taxes is respectfully employed. I, for one, would never maximize or minimize one over another.
HM
3:59 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Swanson - You missed the point completely. Jobs pay the going rate. The point Dr is making is that just because some people in Grayslake make more than the average teacher, that does not mean every teacher should be paid more. It does not matter what job you have - the pay is the market rate for it. Every job is very important, especially to the person who holds it, and the family they support. Dr's point is actually spot on. Tell me a teacher is more important that a fireman when your house is burning down. Tell me a teacher is more important that a police officer when a crime has been committed against you. They are ALL vitally important, and as a community we should appreciate all of them. But that does not mean we can afford to pay them unlimited sums of money. Look at the amount of property taxes people pay - upwards of 10 percent of their income to property taxes. Terri will say pay more! I will say I have seen good, hardworking families lose their homes because they lost their jobs and could not afford to keep up with the mortgage or the taxes. I can not tell you how many people I know whose property taxes are more per month than their mortgages. It is not sustainable for many, and the economy is not going to improve in Illinois for quite some time.
Dr
4:30 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Thank you HM for explaining to Swanson11. Seriously people, please read the posts and try not to twist the words. Also, I don't believe "you need to have your head examined" is appropriate rebuttal in any way. How inappropriate. Nice.
Benjamin Dover
12:23 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
'11Sal. '12 Sal. Increse in $ % Increase
Abrahams, Lori $86,140 $103,079 $16,939 19.7%
Bartus, Patricia $80,934 $90,937 $10,003 12.4%
Borries, Timothy $78,519 $88,344 $9,825 12.5%
Boxer, Lisa $72,497 $82,182 $9,685 13.4%
Buchanan, Laura $72,497 $82,182 $9,685 13.4%
I could only stomach going through the first 5 names. If you care to see the full 2011 salary list, here you go:
http://www.familytaxpayers.org/ftf/ftf_district.php?did=13184&year=2011
And Terri until you can substantiate your asertion that there are "significant errors" in these numbers....save you breath. I use numbers released by the district. If you claim they are untrue, prove it.
Terri
2:23 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Just look at C-Dub's posting below...you guys can't get the same number twice! Do you know why the numbers you post are what they are? And shame on you both for posting names with data you don't understand!
C-Dub
2:26 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Terri,
Even though it is public record. You are correct. I deleted my post.
Terri
2:30 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
BTW...if you think the district numbers are the correct ones, why don't they match the ones in the web link you posted? Rather than exposing folks to all the right-wing rhetoric at familytaxpayers or champion, I posted a link to the ACTUAL database both these sites use. It is much more user-friendly and gives you the ability to see all components.
Terri
2:33 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Thank you, C-Dub.
Vicki Comerford
2:54 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
The worst part about this strike is that it is seemingly pitting teachers against parents against seniors in our community, and everyone should be ashamed. This is about the kids. Period. Regardless of where any of us stands on this issue, I would hope we all agree that teachers should not have their salaries posted on The Patch. There are many facets to this topic, and NONE of us has all of the details. To sit here and debate who is right and who is wrong is shameful. This is supposed to be about the best education for our kids, and nothing else.
Black Betty
4:20 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
@ Benjamin Dover.
Become educated and share holistic information. If you would have clicked on the names you posted, you would see how long they have been with teaching to reach that earning potential.
For examples, Abrahams has been teaching for 26 years.
I'm surprised at a lot of the irrelevant argument of semantics here.
I'm assuming you all against raises and dealing with hard times... (yawn) are all working for your health.
Terri
12:34 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Compare the report to the ISBE report. The ISBE report is prepared by the state, and IMHO, the more accurate of the 2.
http://www.isbe.net/research/htmls/salary_report.htm
Some errors are in excess of 30%. If these are the types of numbers the district is forecasting from, I can see why they think they have a problem.
I don't believe that raises are the most important issue on the table for teachers. I suggest you speak to as many as you can.
HM
1:24 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
so the errors are not verified by you - just a hunch? There are differences to be sure - but could there be differences in what each document is looking at?
Terri
2:17 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
It's not a hunch...it's right there in black & white. There absolutely could be an explanation...wouldn't it have been prudent to publish it? If the report said no teacher made over $75k, wouldn't you want that explained?
Dr
1:03 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
@Terri, I certainly see your point. The two reports are definately different. First, I think we should understand which is correct. I understand the ISBE report is created from information "reported" by the districts. I am not sure where the other posted list is from. Obviously, one has to be correct and the other wrong. The numbers posted on the school site look like a printout from a payroll system (which if so would be the most accurate). At this point, I don't think that anyone on this site can say which is right for sure.
Terri
1:25 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
I know you'd like for the district report to be correct; however, if that we're the case, you'd have a lot of teachers looking for corrections...the ISBE report is the one that goes to TRS to determine their retirements. It matches the salary schedules attached to the existing teacher contract. And, if it were a payroll report, the district should be fighting to get those overpayments back! Obviously, the district report excludes/includes something. I would think they'd post those caveats with the the data. Unless, at the risk of sounding like another conspiracy theorist, the district wants to create unrest and polarization.
Dr
1:06 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
One last point though. If raises are not the most imporatnt issue on the table for teachers, then why:
"Friday's session included the union's suggestion of having a one year contract with a salary increase of about 1.75 percent for 2012-13, which the district has not agreed to."
JustStopIt
2:28 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Please note that the teachers making these salaries have Masters degrees plus multiple graduate level hours past their Masters, and have been working as teachers for more than 15 years.
Terri
2:38 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Other variables one might consider...
If a teacher was on maternity leave 4 months in 2011, and worked all of 2012, could simple math lead one to the wrong conclusion? Of course. This all started with a report the district posted on salaries over $75k. I don't know why it's wrong, or why they even posted it.. Thanks, JustStopIt, for at least having an open mind.
Charles Johnson
3:03 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
I'll take a stab at explaining the variance between the two reports. ISBE's data is salary data uploaded from FY12. The district's Comp Report in excess of $75,000 is for FY13. You're comparing apples and oranges.
Terri
3:15 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Nope...ISBE report, compounded by salary schedule does not come anywhere near the report posted by the district. You can't have a teacher making $75k in '11 making $95k in '13 without a reason. The $75k number is confirmed by looking at salary reports from ISBE for several years, verifying years of service and education from the same source, and comparing that to the contract salary schedule. The near 30% increase to the district-posted document is unexplainable.
Terri
3:23 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
CORRECTION...the $75k is 2012...not '11...
Charles Johnson
4:25 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
They appear to be for two DIFFERENT years. Plus, we don't know who was on FMLA leave or what their extra duty pay was or what the district includes in compensation in their report to comply with PA97-0609 reporting requirements. It doesn't really matter, unless you intend to build your own payroll budget for the district from the bottom up. The key take away is that there are a significant number of teachers landing on that $75K and over report. And one might wonder about the district's return on investment if in one classroom of 3rd graders, Teacher X is making $100K and in the room next to that, Teacher Y is making $50K. Are the students being taught by Teacher X getting twice the education than their peers in Teacher Y's classroom? My guess is the difference is indistinguishable. So why would/should the district pay a $50K premium for the same outcome? Especially if the incremental $50K forces cut backs elsewhere in the district. If I were you, I think I would stop talking about reports that highlight how expensive some of the teachers are.
Terri
5:08 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
...erroneously...
Terri
9:41 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013
Think I found it. Many teachers take salary for 20 pays. Many for 24. It appears that the CFO took a pay period and extended them all by 24. If you do the math ({pay/24}20) on the ones that don't match the ISBE data base, you get real darn close. Several of the teachers on the list don't even make the minimum to warrant being on it. Seems a pretty egregious error for a CFO.
C-Dub
10:18 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013
@Terri, while we tend to disagree on things. I admire your passion and knowledge. I went into this with a closed mind focused on one thing. You have made many good points and now I have opened up my mind and just want a fair dealing between both sides. LET'S GET THIS DONE AND FOCUS ON THE FUTURE!
Mike
3:35 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Here is the deal all! Let's all look at salaries and tax implications and I agree it stinks. The deal is this. I have two children in district 46 and my wife and I are making ends meet. If the teachers strike, one of us is going to have to stay home instead of paying $30 per child for "day care" instead of education (which we paid for at the being of the school year). I don't want my taxes going up and I also don't want my children sitting at home playing Wii all day.
Get this done now and all is forgiven! I though Grayslake was going to be the next Libertyville not the next ................... fill in the blank
Mike
3:50 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
I agree Mike. Times are tough and the teachers, board, and the union need to understand what us parents are going through. It's my understanding that the $30 is per day and our children will be well taken care of.
Let's hope this get's done in the next 4 hours.
HM
3:48 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Until we know the reason for the differeing amounts on the school's document and on the ISBE report, I think this discussion should be tabled. Terri - you can say it is wrong all day long, but until you know for certain, let's let this one go. I'm pretty sure the district will not put this request in as a high priority, but I would like to know why the discrepancies are so big in a few instances. My hunch is that they are looking at different data.
Mike
3:52 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Sorry all. I replied to the wrong comment. Mike
Knee Jerk
4:12 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
I didn't think you could put something on the internet that was not true.
Black Betty
4:29 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Speaking of leaders and people running the school board. Why are we giving these people so much credit. I wouldn't want these people anywhere near my kids.
D46 Board Member Seeking County Board had Prior Arrests Under Another Name
Published reports say Michael Carbone, a Grayslake District 46 board member who is seeking election to Lake County Board District 16, had prior arrests under a different last name.
Facklam received a letter from Lake County State’s Attorney Michael Waller dated Aug. 9 which concluded she had violated Section 29-1 of the Illinois Election Code by giving $5 Culver’s gift certificates to at least two individuals to influence them to register to vote for her.
Black Betty
4:29 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
The unlawful act of utilizing public resources and taxpayer time to openly campaign and solicit support for Mary Garcia and Sue Facklam during the April 5th consolidated elections. This action puts at risk CCSD 46's funding from state and local government.
- The wanton neglect of CCSD 46's students during the Tuesday January 31st 2011 snowstorm, in which both Prarieview and Woodview classes were in session while ALL fire exits were blocked with snow, placing at risk over 700 students in the event of a fire emergency. This action took place while there is documentation that Ms. Correll spent time during her work day campaigning.
- The deliberate decision to campaign through and with resources made available by the CCSD 46 PTO for specific candidates, which directly place the in jeopardy the PTOs 501(c)3 status from the IRS.
- The request to utilize and pay the bills with taxpayer funds associated with Kevin Gordon, attorney for the CCSD 46 school district to provide legal advice for the school board campaign of Mary Garcia and Sue Facklam during the April 5th 2011 consolidated election.
Grayslake Resident
4:34 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Corrupt politicians?!? What will you guys dream up next! ;-p
Black Betty
4:36 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Just the facts ma'am.
BMF
8:43 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
I think Grayslake should set an example for the rest of Illinois and hire non unionized teachers. The union has no place in schools. If it's about the kids let's get the best teachers not the tenure teachers. Let's stop playing its about the kids. It's unfair to them. It about money hence the strike. If it's so crappy for teachers and the administration let them strike. Let's get new teachers that truly care about the kids and appreciate the job they have. There is no shortage of people applying for teaching jobs. I think the district will be fine. I've heard people compare teachers wages to that of Lake Forest and Libertyville. The demographic is completely different. I say if the grass is greener see you later!
Black Betty
12:05 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Yep, I'm sure you'll find some highly qualified teachers that will "learn your kids real gud" making 28,000 a year. Hmm... to be a teacher or be a door greeter at Wal-Mart? Decisions.... Decisions...
Gerald Ryan
9:07 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Here are a few questions you should ask Board Member Kip Evans:
**Why did he go out on strike for 8 weeks (37 school days) in 1994 as a teacher in Round Lake School District 116?
**In his final few years as a teacher in Round Lake, what salary raises was he given to help sweeten his (current) pension? (which he now collects)
**Why did he join the EARL (Education Association of Round Lake) negotiations team when he was just a few years away from retirement? (What was/were his motive(s)?)
Lennie Jarratt
9:55 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
I always find it interesting that the personal attacks are mostly directed at the board minority who effectively have no say the final terms of the deal.
Lorax
9:57 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
BMF- if you want great, well-educated, non unionized teachers you still have to pay for them. Great teachers are not going to come to a district that gets paid sufficiently less then the surrounding districts. Our school district has already lost teachers/administration to surrounding districts. I know everyone says that a teacher goes into teaching for the kids, but teachers also need to be compensated for their time. The teachers are not asking for much. In the first year they are asking for 1/2 of what they were promised for continuing their education ( to become better teachers) the majority of their masters programs our paid out if pocket. In order for them to make more money they have to spend more money.
Black Betty
12:39 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Lorax- Great Insight.
In addition, most new teachers leave the profession within 3-5 years.
I mean most people change jobs when they feel underappreciated, can you imagine what it must feel like having an uneducated public express their .02.
BMF
8:27 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
I think you are mistaken by your belief that you have to pay a ridiculous amount in property tax to have great teachers. My masters program was paid out of my pocket as well and that helped me to keep my job in this economy not demand more money. How much are tax payers willing to pay to keep funding the union? Grayslake is already undesirable for most home buyers and business because of the crazy taxes. This just adds to the embarrassment.
Black Betty
8:42 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
BMF, I don't think that was ever stated.
It would be logical to think that the more education a teacher has, the more effective they are. I'm sure the same applies to the reason why you pursued higher education.
If the contract states that a teacher will receive X amount of pay increase once X level of higher education is completed, they should be compensated for it. The idea is to have highly qualified teachers in our children's classrooms.
http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/methods/teachers/hqtflexibility.html
BMF
9:15 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Asking for anything when businesses are leaving and people are paying outrageous taxes is to much. I have many neighbors that are working a second and third job to keep up with the taxes. Many have had pay cuts and benefits cut. What good are overpaid teachers, administration, and UNIONS if the parents aren't there to parent? Its been my experience that you can have the best teachers, but if the parents aren't involved it doesn't matter.
MB
10:00 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Is there any word on whether they have come to an agreement?
Lennie Jarratt
10:06 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Most likely, we won't find out until sometime after midnight and most likely closer to 2 am.
MB
10:08 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Holy cow! Thank you. My lack of knowledge about teachers unions is going to be incredibly obvious in a moment, but what is a lane change?
Lennie Jarratt
10:17 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
A lane change is a horizontal move across the pay schedule based on the number of hours completed toward an advanced degree.
A step is a vertical move down the pay schedule because of another year of service.
MB
10:35 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Thank you!
Lennie Jarratt
11:20 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Come out the the Townhall meeting tomorrow night @7pm and learn a whole lot more.
State Bank of the Lakes
50 Commerce Dr.
Grayslake
Lorax
10:48 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Teachers in this district do care about these children. I know of teachers that go to their students plays, sporting events, piano recitals, and other out of school activities. These teachers give up their own time to support these children in non academic activities, because these children invite their teachers to be there. These Grayslake children would not invite teachers that don't care about them to their personal activities out of school.
Angela Sykora
10:55 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
From the District:
UPDATE: As of 10:30PM the Board of Education and Teachers' Union are still in negotiations.
Please be advised that in the event of a teachers' strike on Wednesday, January 16th, all communication updates will take place here on the District website: www.d46.org
Angela Sykora
11:43 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
D46 Facebook Administrator said per Supt. Correll, there is NO time limit, so this could end soon or at 3 a.m. I'm gonna need snacks!
Klive
12:04 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Apparently, both Mikes feel teachers are babysitters. Give us credit. We are your children's psychologist, social worker, counselor, caregiver and most importantly educator. I too, am a parent who wants the best education for my children and put faith in their teachers no matter the circumstances. Apparently babysitting is more important to you than making sure your child has a childhood filled with excitement for learning each and every day. What will your children learn? I pray that my children will continue to value education as I do and continue to learn respect towards others and empathy towards those who require it.
Lennie Jarratt
1:28 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Black Betty, interesting your veiled threat. Then you cowardly deleted it after posting it 4 times.
Black Betty
1:59 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Lennie,
Finally! Thank you for the acknowledgment! Awkwardly enough, I faced a web browser issue that wouldn’t allow me to receive confirmation that my post had generated or not. Great success! Much thanks again.
I am happy that you were able to read my initial point and please know that I stand behind the original statement.
Your agenda for self-promotion or self validation is not wanted or needed here.
Cheers,
BB
Lennie Jarratt
2:48 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Come out the the Townhall meeting tomorrow night @7pm and learn a whole lot more.
State Bank of the Lakes
50 Commerce Dr.
Grayslake
Black Betty
8:28 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013
Lennie has no facts or info of the CLOSED SESSION NEGOTIATIONS.
NO CLOSED SESSION NEGOTIATION INFORMATION WILL BE AT LENNIE'S MEETING. CLOSED SESSION CONVERSATIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BE DISCUSSED WITH ANYBODY OUTSIDE OF THE CLOSED SESSION MEETINGS.
IT'S A LENNIE MEETING, FOR LENNIE, BY LENNIE, ENDORSED BY LENNIE
The information is he presented is only HIS OWN to push HIS AGENDA. IF LENNIE IS SHARING INFORMATION BY THE BOARD, IT IS WRONG.
Black Betty
3:49 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Lennie, your time would be better spent on treadmill.
Nobody is interested in your one-sided opinion.
Ain't nobody got time for that.
Lisa Henderson
6:50 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
For any parents who are in need of child care and find there is no room at the other programs there are plenty of in home child care providers in Grayslake who will be able to help you during the strike. check out www.lakecountyhomedaycare.com for names of providers.
Mia
9:53 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
This was brought to my attention by my husband, that Grayslake Teachers Pay Scales is considerably lower that surrounding districts, including Round Lake Area Schools. Therefore, we need to be cautious that we don't lose a lot of good teachers and in return get what we pay for, the teachers that other districts don't want. I am just looking at this merely from a business and performance point of view. We won't see the impact from of this strike and negotiations right away, but it will definitely have an impact of real estate and re-sale values. It is too bad, this used to be a good community :( I am so sad!!!
Lennie Jarratt
4:08 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Reminder - 7pm at State Bank of the Lakes, 50 Commerce Dr, Grayslake.
Townhall meeting to discuss the strike. Hosted by For Our Children's Future.
Forethe Community
11:54 am on Friday, February 1, 2013
350 people showed up Sunday in the freezing cold to support the teachers of their district. That’s:
• 10 times the number that showed up for either of the For Our Children’s Future town halls.
• 10 times the number, on average, that shows up to BOE meetings.
• 5 times the number that have ever shown up for a BOE meeting (in recent history).
30 local business showed their support for the teachers by supplying food, providing parking, providing warming shelters, allowing access to their bathrooms, and donating cash to help teachers that might need it in a prolonged strike. Residual benefits went to local food banks through excess donations. That’s:
• 10 times the number of local business’s that spoke at any levy hearing.
• Equal to the number of attendants at any For Our Children’s Future town Hall.
• Equal to or greater than the average attendance at a BOE meeting.
Actions speak louder than words. I applaud the board for listening to the public. I only wish the silent majority had been more vocal at the levy hearings. It’s too late to do what the public really wanted.
Forethe Community
1:34 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
350 people showed up Sunday in the freezing cold to support the teachers of their district. That’s:
• 10 times the number that showed up for either of the For Our Children’s Future town halls.
• 10 times the number, on average, that shows up to BOE meetings.
• 5 times the number that have ever shown up for a BOE meeting (in recent history).
30 local business showed their support for the teachers by supplying food, providing parking, providing warming shelters, allowing access to their bathrooms, and donating cash to help teachers that might need it in a prolonged strike. Residual benefits went to local food banks through excess donations. That’s:
• 10 times the number of local business’s that spoke at any levy hearing.
• Equal to the number of attendants at any For Our Children’s Future town Hall.
• Equal to or greater than the average attendance at a BOE meeting.
Actions speak louder than words. I applaud the board for listening to the public. I only wish the silent majority had been more vocal at the levy hearings. It’s too late to do what the public really wanted.